Even as the court rejected Trump’s freeze on USAID, it effectively gave him another chance to delay sending life-saving money abroad.

A pair of rulings have exposed deep divisions on the Supreme Court about just how much power the federal judiciary has to stop President Donald Trump – and could have enormous implications for the flood of litigation challenging Trump’s actions.

Although the outcome is a short-term loss for Trump’s administration, the nonprofit groups and businesses that sued are still waiting for the money they say they are owed. Organizations in the U.S. and around the world have cut services and laid off thousands of workers as a result.

Justice Samuel Alito penned a scathing dissent to the Supreme Court's decision ending a temporary pause on foreign aid payments through the U.S. Agency for International Development.

Former U.S. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr is joining the legal battles over President Donald Trump’s broad crackdown on spending, accusing the administration in a lawsuit of withholding funds from a nonprofit focused on boosting democratic institutions.

The case examines whether the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has the authority to grant a license to Interim Storage Partners Inc. to proceed with plans to construct a storage facility in West Texas. The NRC has also approved a license for a group that intends to build a similar project deep underground in southeastern New Mexico.

The U.S. Supreme Court's current term includes cases involving guns, gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors, online pornography, religious rights, TikTok, preventive healthcare, Planned Parenthood funding,

The 5-to-4 decision is the latest setback for the agency and could have sweeping implications for curtailing water pollution offshore.

Here’s how federal courts help determine the fate of controversial issues, such as immigration laws, in Texas and beyond.